NOTES ON THE EMACS BUG TRACKER -*- outline -*- The Emacs Bug Tracker can be found at http://debbugs.gnu.org/ For a list of all bugs, see http://debbugs.gnu.org/db/pa/lemacs.html This is a static page, updated once a day. There is also a dynamic list, generated on request, but since there are many bug reports this is slow and not recommended. ** How do I report a bug in Emacs now? The same way as you always did. Send mail to bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, or use M-x report-emacs-bug. The only differences are: i) Your report will be assigned a number and generate an automatic reply. ii) Optionally, you can set some database parameters when you first report a bug (see "Setting bug parameters" below). iii) If you want to CC: someone, use X-Debbugs-CC: (this is important; see below). Once your report is filed and assigned a number, it is sent out to the bug mailing list. In some cases, it may be appropriate to just file a bug, without sending out a copy. To do this, send mail to quiet@debbugs.gnu.org. ** How do I reply to an existing bug report? Reply to 123@debbugs.gnu.org, replacing 123 with the number of the bug you are interested in. NB this only sends mail to the bug-list, it does NOT (?) send a CC to the original bug submitter. So you need to explicitly CC him/her (and anyone else you like). (Many people think the submitter SHOULD be automatically subscribed to subsequent discussion, but this does not seem to be implemented. See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=37078) Do NOT send a separate copy to the bug list, since this may generate a new report. The only time to send mail to the bug list is to create a new report. Gnus users can add the following to message-dont-reply-to-names; similarly with Rmail and rmail-dont-reply-to-names: "\\(emacs-pretest-bug\\|bug-gnu-emacs\\)@gnu\\.org\\|\ \\(submit\\|control\\|owner\\)@debbugs\\.gnu\\.org" The "owner@debbugs.gnu.org" entry is there because it appears in the "Resent-To" header. For a long time Rmail erroneously included such headers in replies. If you correspond with an Rmail user on a bug, these addresses may end up in the Cc. Mailing to them does nothing but create duplicates and errors. (It is possible you might want to have a dialog with the owner address, outside of normal bug reporting.) ** When reporting a bug, to send a Cc to another address (e.g. bug-cc-mode@gnu.org), do NOT just use a Cc: header. Instead, use "X-Debbugs-CC:". This ensures the Cc address will get a mail with the bug report number in. If you do not do this, each reply in the subsequent discussion will end up creating a new bug. This is annoying. Note that the way this feature works is perhaps not ideal (Bug#1720). If X-Debbugs-CC: was specifed by a real header, that header is removed in the mail sent out to the bug list, and the addresses merged into the Resent-CC header (see below). They don't appear as an explicit CC: header, nor do they appear in the Reply-To: header. So people you X-Debbugs-CC are not included in any following discussion unless they are manually cc'd. So this feature really only serves to notify them that a bug has been filed. It's then up to them to follow any subsequent discussion. If X-Debbugs-CC were merged into the Reply-To header, this might work more the way people expect. ** How does Debbugs send out mails? The mails are sent out to the bug list with From: and To: unchanged. Eg if you file a bug with "submit@debbugs.gnu.org", that remains in the To: address. They reach the bug list by being resent. Mails arriving at the bug list have the following Resent-* headers: Resent-From: person who submitted the bug Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: maintainer email address, plus any X-Debbugs-CC: entries The "maintainer email address" is "bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org" in most cases. A new report also has: Mail-Followup-To: bug submitter, 123@debbugs.gnu.org ** To not get acknowledgement mail from the tracker, add an "X-Debbugs-No-Ack:" header (with any value). If you use Gnus, you can add an element to gnus-posting-styles to do this automatically, eg: ("gnu-emacs\\(-pretest\\)?-bug" ("X-Debbugs-No-Ack" "yes")) (adjust the regexp according to the name you use for the bug lists) ** To record a bug in the tracker without sending mail to the bug list. This can be useful to make a note of something discussed on emacs-devel that needs fixing. In other words, this can be the equivalent of adding something to FOR-RELEASE. To: quiet@debbugs.gnu.org [headers end] Package: emacs Version: 23.0.60 Severity: minor Remember to fix FOO, as discussed on emacs-devel at http://... . ** Not interested in tracker control messages (tags being set, etc)? Discard mails matching: ^X-Emacs-PR-Message: transcript When you close a bug, you get a message matching: ^X-Emacs-PR-Message: closed ** How to avoid multiple copies of mails. When you reply to a bug, respect the Reply-To address, ie send mail only to the submitter address and the numbered bug address. Do not send mail direct to bug-gnu-emacs or emacs-pretest-bug unless you are reporting a new bug. ** To close bug #123 (for example), send mail To: 123-done@debbugs.gnu.org with a brief explanation in the body as to why the bug was closed. There is no need to cc the address without the "-done" part or the submitter; they get copies anyway so this will just result in more duplicate mail. ** Setting bug parameters. There are two ways to set the parameters of bugs in the database (tags, severity level, etc). When you report a new bug, you can provide a "pseudo-header" at the start of the report, eg: Package: emacs Version: 23.0.60 Severity: minor Optionally, add a sub-package, eg Package: emacs,calendar. This can include tags. Some things (e.g. submitter) don't seem to work here. Otherwise, send mail to the control server, control@debbugs.gnu.org. At the start of the message body, supply the desired commands, one per line: command bug-number [arguments] ... quit|stop|thank|thanks|thankyou|thank you The control server ignores anything after the last line above. So you can place control commands at the beginning of a reply to a bug report, and Bcc: the control server (note the commands have no effect if you just send them to the bug-report number). Bcc: is better than Cc: in case people use Reply-to-All in response. Some useful control commands: *** To reopen a closed bug: reopen 123 *** Bugs can be tagged in various ways (eg wontfix, patch, etc). The available tags are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed notabug See http://debbugs.gnu.org/Developer#tags The list of tags can be prefixed with +, - or =, meaning to add (the default), remove, or reset the tags. E.g.: tags 123 + wontfix ** URL shortcuts http://debbugs.gnu.org/... 123 # given bug number 123;mbox=yes # mbox version of given bug package # bugs in given package (don't use "emacs" - too many bugs!) from:submitter@email.address severity:severity # all bugs of given severity tag:tag # all bugs with given tag ** Usertags See "Usertags" are very similar to tags: a set of labels that can be added to a bug. There are two differences between normal tags and user tags: 1) Anyone can define any valid usertag they like. In contrast, only a limited, predefined set of normal tags are available (see above). 2) A usertag is associated with a specific email address. You set usertags in the same way as tags, by talking to the control server. One difference is that you can also specify the associated email address. If you don't explicitly specify an address, then it will use the one from which you send the control message. The address must have the form of an email address (with an "@" sign and least 4 characters after the "@"). *** Setting usertags a) In a control message: user bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org usertags 1234 any-tag-you-like This will add a usertag "any-tag-you-like" to bug 1234. The tag will be associated with the address "bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org". If you omit the first line, the tag will be associated with your email address. The syntax of the usertags command is the same as that of tags (eg wrt the optional [=+-] argument). b) In an initial submission, in the pseudo-header: User: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Usertags: a-new-tag Again, the "User" is optional. *** Searching by usertags The search interface is not as advanced as for normal tags. You need to construct the relevant url yourself rather than just typing in a search box. The only piece you really need to add is the "users" portion, the rest has the same syntax as normal. **** To find all bugs usertagged by a given email address: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/pkgreport.cgi?users=bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org (Supposedly, the "users" field can be a comma-separated list of more than one email address, but it does not seem to work for me.) **** To find bugs tagged with a specific usertag: This works just like a normal tags search, but with the addition of a "users" field. Eg: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/pkgreport.cgi?users=bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org;tag=calendar *** To merge bugs: Eg when bad replies create a bunch of new bugs for the same report. Bugs must all be in the same state (e.g. same package(s) and severity -- see `reassign' and `severity' below), but need not have the same tags (tags are merged). E.g.: merge 123 124 125 ... Note that merging does not affect titles. In particular, a "retitle" of merged bugs only affects individual bugs, not all of them. *** Forcing a merge: Like `merge', but bugs need not be in the same state. The packages must still match though (see `reassign' below). The first one listed is the master. E.g.: forcemerge 123 124 125 ... Note: you cannot merge with an archived bug - you must unarchive it first. *** To unmerge bugs: To disconnect a bug from all bugs it is merged with: unmerge 123 This command accepts only one bug number. *** To clone bugs: Useful when one report refers to more than one bug. clone 123 -1 [-2 ...] retitle -1 second bug retitle -2 third bug The negative numbers provide a way to refer to the cloned bugs (which will be assigned proper numbers). NB you cannot clone a merged bug. You'd think that trying to do so would just give you an unmerged copy of the specified bug number, but no: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=474742 You must unmerge, clone, then re-merge. *** To set severity: severity 123 critical|grave|serious|important|normal|minor|wishlist See http://debbugs.gnu.org/Developer#severities for the meanings. *** To set the owner of a bug: owner 123 A Hacker The shorthand `!' means your own address. *** To remove the owner of a bug: noowner 123 *** To mark a bug as fixed in a particular version: fixed 123 23.0.60 *** To remove a "fixed" mark: notfixed 123 23.0.60 *** To assign or reassign a bug to a package or list of packages: reassign 1234 emacs,cc-mode ** To remove spam from the tracker, move it to the `spam' pseudo-package: reassign 123 spam ** To change the title of a bug: retitle 123 Some New Title ** To change the submitter address: submitter 123 none@example.com Note that it does not seem to work to specify "Submitter:" in the pseudo-header when first reporting a bug. ** How does archiving work? You can still send mail to a bug after it is closed. After 28 days with no activity, the bug is archived, at which point no more changes can be made. If you try to send mail to the bug after that (or merge with it), it will be rejected. To make any changes, you must unarchive it first: unarchive 123 The bug will be re-archived after the next 28 day period of no activity. ** The web-page with the list of bugs is slow to load It's a function of the number of displayed bugs. You can speed things up by only looking at the newest 100 bugs: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?newest=100;package=emacs Or use the static index: http://debbugs.gnu.org/db/ix/full.html ** ChangeLog issues *** When you fix a bug, it can be helpful to put the bug number in the ChangeLog entry, for example: * foo.el (foofunc): Fix the `foo' case. (Bug#123) Then the relevant bug can be found for easy reference. If it's an obvious fix (e.g. a typo), there's no need to clutter the log with the bug number. Similarly, when you close a bug, it can be helpful to include the relevant ChangeLog entry in the message to the bug tracker, so people can see eaxctly what the fix was. *** bug-reference-mode Activate `bug-reference-mode' in ChangeLogs to get clickable links to the bug web-pages. *** Debian stuff http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2009-11/msg00440.html ** Gnus-specific voodoo *** Put point on a bug-number and try: M-x gnus-read-ephemeral-emacs-bug-group *** If the above is not available: (add-hook 'gnus-article-mode-hook (lambda () (setq bug-reference-url-format "http://debbugs.gnu.org/%s") (bug-reference-mode 1))) and you can click on the bug number in the subject header. * Technical Notes The following are technical notes on how it works. These are just for reference, you don't need to read these as a user of the system. Getting mail from the Emacs bug list into the tracker requires the assistance of sysadmin at gnu.org. The test tracker set-up was, I think, [gnu.org #359140]: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/savannah-hackers/2008-03/msg00074.html http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/savannah-hackers/2008-04/msg00034.html ** The debbugs.gnu.org setup was handled in [gnu.org #510605]. There are two pieces (replace AT with @ in the following): i) fencepost has an /etc/aliases entry: emacs-pretest-bug: submit AT debbugs.gnu.org ii) An exim router: emacsbugs_router: driver = redirect senders = !Debian-debbugs AT debbugs.gnu.org local_parts = bug-gnu-emacs domains = gnu.org data = submit AT debbugs.gnu.org This says, for mail arriving at bug-gnu-emacs, only allow it through to the list if it was sent from debbugs.gnu.org. Otherwise, send it to the submit address at the bug-tracker. FIXME There's probably an issue with the mail-news gateway here that still needs to be addressed (bug#936). ** fencepost's /etc/exim4/local_domains configuration needs a line !debbugs.gnu.org adding [gnu.org #503532]. Otherwise people on fencepost can't report bugs, since *.gnu.org addresses are assumed to be handled locally on fencepost, unless otherwise specified. ** All mail arriving at debbugs.gnu.org is first run through SpamAssassin. Obvious spam is rejected, the rest is sent on to the moderated list debbugs-submit. Approved mail is passed on to the tracker. (Note this means that messages may appear out of sequence in the tracker, since mail from whitelisted senders goes straight through.) NOTE: An alternative to this would be to use listhelper AT nongnu.org as a moderator address. Eg the emacs-bug-tracker list uses this. It does basic spam processing on the moderator requests and automatically rejects the obviously bogus ones. Someone still has to accept the good ones though. The advantage of this would not be having to run and tune our own spam filter. See http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/listhelper An "X-Debbugs-Envelope-To" header is used to keep track of where the mail was actually bound for: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2009-11/msg01211.html ** Mailing list recipient/sender filters. The following mailman filters are useful to stop messages being needlessly held for moderation: *** debbugs-submit (quiet|control|submit)@(debbugs\.gnu\.org|emacsbugs\.donarmstrong\.com) [0-9]+(-done|-quiet|-subscribe)?@(debbugs\.gnu\.org|emacsbugs\.donarmstrong\.com) (bug-gnu-emacs|emacs-pretest-bug)@gnu\.org *** emacs-bug-tracker sender: bug-gnu-emacs AT gnu.org recipient: emacs-bug-tracker AT debbugs\.gnu\.org The latter is because that is the address that debbugs actually sends to. An /etc/aliases entry redirects it to the real emacs-bug-tracker address.