- (setq pos (point))
- (when (or (eq (car (c-beginning-of-decl-1 lim)) 'previous)
- (= pos (point)))
- ;; We moved back over the previous defun. Skip to the next
- ;; one. Not using c-forward-syntactic-ws here since we
- ;; should not skip a macro. We can also be directly after
- ;; the block in a `c-opt-block-decls-with-vars-key'
- ;; declaration, but then we won't move significantly far
- ;; here.
- (goto-char pos)
- (c-forward-comments)
-
- (when (and near (c-beginning-of-macro))
- (throw 'exit
- (cons (point)
- (save-excursion
- (c-end-of-macro)
- (forward-line 1)
- (point))))))
-
- (if (eobp) (throw 'exit nil))
-
- ;; Check if `c-beginning-of-decl-1' put us after the block in a
- ;; declaration that doesn't end there. We're searching back and
- ;; forth over the block here, which can be expensive.
- (setq pos (point))
- (if (and c-opt-block-decls-with-vars-key
- (progn
- (c-backward-syntactic-ws)
- (eq (char-before) ?}))
- (eq (car (c-beginning-of-decl-1))
- 'previous)
- (save-excursion
- (c-end-of-decl-1)
- (and (> (point) pos)
- (setq end-pos (point)))))
- nil
- (goto-char pos))
-
- (if (and (not near) (> (point) start))
- nil
-
- ;; Try to be line oriented; position the limits at the
- ;; closest preceding boi, and after the next newline, that
- ;; isn't inside a comment, but if we hit a neighboring
- ;; declaration then we instead use the exact declaration
- ;; limit in that direction.
- (cons (progn