(backward-char 1))
(when (eq (char-before) ?|)
(backward-char 1) t)))
- (when (progn (backward-char 2)
- (if (> start (line-end-position))
- (put-text-property (point) (1+ start)
- 'syntax-multiline t))
- ;; FIXME: The `in' may just be a random argument to
- ;; a normal command rather than the real `in' keyword.
- ;; I.e. we should look back to try and find the
- ;; corresponding `case'.
- (and (looking-at ";[;&]\\|\\_<in")
- ;; ";; esac )" is a case that looks like a case-pattern
- ;; but it's really just a close paren after a case
- ;; statement. I.e. if we skipped over `esac' just now,
- ;; we're not looking at a case-pattern.
- (not (looking-at "..[ \t\n]+esac[^[:word:]_]"))))
- sh-st-punc))))
+ (and (> (point) (1+ (point-min)))
+ (progn (backward-char 2)
+ (if (> start (line-end-position))
+ (put-text-property (point) (1+ start)
+ 'syntax-multiline t))
+ ;; FIXME: The `in' may just be a random argument to
+ ;; a normal command rather than the real `in' keyword.
+ ;; I.e. we should look back to try and find the
+ ;; corresponding `case'.
+ (and (looking-at ";[;&]\\|\\_<in")
+ ;; ";; esac )" is a case that looks like a case-pattern
+ ;; but it's really just a close paren after a case
+ ;; statement. I.e. if we skipped over `esac' just now,
+ ;; we're not looking at a case-pattern.
+ (not (looking-at "..[ \t\n]+esac[^[:word:]_]"))))
+ sh-st-punc))))
(defun sh-font-lock-backslash-quote ()
(if (eq (save-excursion (nth 3 (syntax-ppss (match-beginning 0)))) ?\')