(should (equal actual-condition expected-condition)))))))
(ert-deftest ert-test-deftest ()
+ ;; FIXME: These tests don't look very good. What is their intent, i.e. what
+ ;; are they really testing? The precise generated code shouldn't matter, so
+ ;; we should either test the behavior of the code, or else try to express the
+ ;; kind of efficiency guarantees we're looking for.
(should (equal (macroexpand '(ert-deftest abc () "foo" :tags '(bar)))
'(progn
(ert-set-test 'abc