+ t1 = t2, t2 = t, t += dt, dst2 = tm.tm_isdst != 0)
+ if (t == t1 && t != t2
+ && (tm.tm_isdst < 0
+ || (isdst < 0
+ ? dst2 <= (tm.tm_isdst != 0)
+ : (isdst != 0) != (tm.tm_isdst != 0))))
+ /* We can't possibly find a match, as we are oscillating
+ between two values. The requested time probably falls
+ within a spring-forward gap of size DT. Follow the common
+ practice in this case, which is to return a time that is DT
+ away from the requested time, preferring a time whose
+ tm_isdst differs from the requested value. (If no tm_isdst
+ was requested and only one of the two values has a nonzero
+ tm_isdst, prefer that value.) In practice, this is more
+ useful than returning -1. */
+ break;
+ else if (--remaining_probes == 0)