* simple.el (shell-command-to-string): Use `process-file'.

[gnu-emacs] / lisp / emacs-lisp / cl-macs.el

diff --git a/lisp/emacs-lisp/cl-macs.el b/lisp/emacs-lisp/cl-macs.el
index 5a10633e4da9034da5175d525c946752251d17a2..c57d37703b024091ffa76d4b8306f601b9efd120 100644 (file)
--- a/lisp/emacs-lisp/cl-macs.el
+++ b/lisp/emacs-lisp/cl-macs.el
@@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
 ;;; cl-macs.el --- Common Lisp macros
 
-;; Copyright (C) 1993, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008,
-;;   2009, 2010, 2011  Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+;; Copyright (C) 1993, 2001-2011  Free Software Foundation, Inc.
 
 ;; Author: Dave Gillespie <daveg@synaptics.com>
 ;; Version: 2.02
@@ -629,7 +628,7 @@ This is equivalent to `(return-from nil RESULT)'."
 ;;;###autoload
 (defmacro return-from (name &optional result)
   "Return from the block named NAME.
-This jump out to the innermost enclosing `(block NAME ...)' form,
+This jumps out to the innermost enclosing `(block NAME ...)' form,
 returning RESULT from that form (or nil if RESULT is omitted).
 This is compatible with Common Lisp, but note that `defun' and
 `defmacro' do not create implicit blocks as they do in Common Lisp."
@@ -1471,7 +1470,7 @@ lexical closures as in Common Lisp.
 (defmacro lexical-let* (bindings &rest body)
   "Like `let*', but lexically scoped.
 The main visible difference is that lambdas inside BODY, and in
-successive bindings within BINDINGS, will create lexical closures
+successive bindings within VARLIST, will create lexical closures
 as in Common Lisp.  This is similar to the behavior of `let*' in
 Common Lisp.
 \n(fn VARLIST BODY)"