;; correct line number, but life's too short.
;; d.love@dl.ac.uk (Dave Love) can be blamed for this
-(defvar gud-irix-p
- (and (string-match "^mips-[^-]*-irix" system-configuration)
- (not (string-match "irix[6-9]\\.[1-9]" system-configuration)))
+(defvar gud-irix-p nil
"Non-nil to assume the interface appropriate for IRIX dbx.
This works in IRIX 4, 5 and 6, but `gud-dbx-use-stopformat-p' provides
a better solution in 6.1 upwards.")
-(defvar gud-dbx-use-stopformat-p
- (string-match "irix[6-9]\\.[1-9]" system-configuration)
+(defvar gud-dbx-use-stopformat-p nil
"Non-nil to use the dbx feature present at least from Irix 6.1
whereby $stopformat=1 produces an output format compatible with
`gud-dbx-marker-filter'.")
-;; [Irix dbx seems to be a moving target. The dbx output changed
+;; [Irix dbx seemed to be a moving target. The dbx output changed
;; subtly sometime between OS v4.0.5 and v5.2 so that, for instance,
;; the output from `up' is no longer spotted by gud (and it's probably
;; not distinctive enough to try to match it -- use C-<, C->
;; exclusively) . For 5.3 and 6.0, the $curline variable changed to
;; `long long'(why?!), so the printf stuff needed changing. The line
;; number was cast to `long' as a compromise between the new `long
-;; long' and the original `int'. This is reported not to work in 6.2,
+;; long' and the original `int'. This was reported not to work in 6.2,
;; so it's changed back to int -- don't make your sources too long.
-;; From Irix6.1 (but not 6.0?) dbx supports an undocumented feature
+;; From Irix6.1 (but not 6.0?) dbx supported an undocumented feature
;; whereby `set $stopformat=1' reportedly produces output compatible
;; with `gud-dbx-marker-filter', which we prefer.
;; The process filter is also somewhat
;; unreliable, sometimes not spotting the markers; I don't know
-;; whether there's anything that can be done about that. It would be
-;; much better if SGI could be persuaded to (re?)instate the MIPS
-;; -emacs flag for gdb-like output (which ought to be possible as most
-;; of the communication I've had over it has been from sgi.com).]
+;; whether there's anything that can be done about that.]
;; this filter is influenced by the xdb one rather than the gdb one
(defun gud-irixdbx-marker-filter (string)