upstream

[gnu-emacs] / admin / grammars / c.by

diff --git a/admin/grammars/c.by b/admin/grammars/c.by
index 1797827679b35293f72554da07eee3c26aa14af7..b49f8ce76c7d998d8da16e9c65fcd17e1c41df23 100644 (file)
--- a/admin/grammars/c.by
+++ b/admin/grammars/c.by
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@
 %put DELETE summary "delete <object>;"
 
 ;; Despite this, this parser can find templates by ignoring the TEMPLATE
-;; keyword, and finding the class/method being templateized.
+;; keyword, and finding the class/method being templatized.
 %token TEMPLATE "template"
 %put TEMPLATE summary "template <class TYPE ...> TYPE_OR_FUNCTION"
 
@@ -566,7 +566,7 @@ template-type
     (TYPE-TAG $2 "class" nil nil )
   | STRUCT symbol
     (TYPE-TAG $2 "struct" nil nil )
- ;; TODO: Klaus Berndl: For the moment is is ok, that we parse the C++
+ ;; TODO: Klaus Berndl: For the moment it is ok, that we parse the C++
  ;; keyword typename as a class....
   | TYPENAME symbol
     (TYPE-TAG $2 "class" nil nil)
@@ -734,7 +734,7 @@ builtintype
 
 ;; Klaus Berndl: This parses also nonsense like "const volatile int
 ;; const volatile const const volatile a ..." but IMHO nobody writes
-;; such code. Normaly we shoud define a rule like typeformbase-mode
+;; such code. Normally we should define a rule like typeformbase-mode
 ;; which exactly defines the different allowed cases and combinations
 ;; of declmods (minus the CVDECLMOD) typeformbase and cv-declmods so
 ;; we could recognize more invalid code but IMHO this is not worth the
@@ -1105,7 +1105,7 @@ fun-or-proto-end
     ( t )
   | semantic-list
     ( nil )
- ;; Here is an anoying feature of C++ pure virtual methods
+ ;; Here is an annoying feature of C++ pure virtual methods
   | EQUAL ZERO SEMICOLON
     ( :pure-virtual-flag )
   | fun-try-end