-@c Copyright (C) 1985, 1986, 1987, 1993, 1995, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004,
-@c 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+@c Copyright (C) 1985-1987, 1993, 1995, 2001-2015 Free Software
+@c Foundation, Inc.
@c
@c Permission is granted to anyone to make or distribute verbatim copies
@c of this document, in any medium, provided that the copyright notice and
@c Modified versions may not be made.
@ifclear justgnu
-@node Manifesto,, Microsoft Windows, Top
+@node Manifesto
@unnumbered The GNU Manifesto
@end ifclear
@ifset justgnu
ways to contribute, see @uref{http://www.gnu.org/help}.
@end quotation
-@unnumberedsec What's GNU? Gnu's Not Unix!
+@unnumberedsec What's GNU@? Gnu's Not Unix!
GNU, which stands for Gnu's Not Unix, is the name for the complete
Unix-compatible software system which I am writing so that I can give it
sophisticated cooling or power.
I have found very many programmers eager to contribute part-time work for
-GNU. For most projects, such part-time distributed work would be very hard
+GNU@. For most projects, such part-time distributed work would be very hard
to coordinate; the independently-written parts would not work together.
But for the particular task of replacing Unix, this problem is absent. A
complete Unix system contains hundreds of utility programs, each of which
@end quotation
There are various forms of free or very cheap publicity that can be used to
-inform numbers of computer users about something like GNU. But it may be
+inform numbers of computer users about something like GNU@. But it may be
true that one can reach more microcomputer users with advertising. If this
is really so, a business which advertises the service of copying and
mailing GNU for a fee ought to be successful enough to pay for its
On the other hand, if many people get GNU from their friends, and such
companies don't succeed, this will show that advertising was not really
-necessary to spread GNU. Why is it that free market advocates don't
+necessary to spread GNU@. Why is it that free market advocates don't
want to let the free market decide this?@footnote{The Free Software
Foundation raises most of its funds from a distribution service,
although it is a charity rather than a company. If @emph{no one}