X-Git-Url: https://code.delx.au/gnu-emacs/blobdiff_plain/7d1130ad367163ec6a631bc77cbba96374e1d70c..27f70a64389dbf769cf75fb672a50ea313495e3f:/man/gnu.texi

diff --git a/man/gnu.texi b/man/gnu.texi
index d28a4dd035..27fe2e2495 100644
--- a/man/gnu.texi
+++ b/man/gnu.texi
@@ -1,14 +1,16 @@
 @c This is part of the Emacs manual.
-@c Copyright (C) 1985, 1986, 1987, 1993, 1995 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+@c Copyright (C) 1985, 1986, 1987, 1993, 1995, 2002, 2003, 2004,
+@c   2005, 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
 @ifclear justgnu
-@node Manifesto,, MS-DOS, Top
+@node Manifesto,, Microsoft Windows, Top
 @unnumbered The GNU Manifesto
 @end ifclear
 @ifset justgnu
-Copyright (C) 1985, 1993, 2001 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+Copyright @copyright{} 1985, 1993, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004,
+2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
 
 Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
-under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.1 or
+under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or
 any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no
 Invariant Sections, with the Front-Cover texts being ``A GNU
 Manual'', and with the Back-Cover Texts as in (a) below.  A copy of the
@@ -382,13 +384,13 @@ other people's lives; and it is usually used to make their lives more
 difficult.
 
 People who have studied the issue of intellectual property
-rights@footnote{n the 80s I had not yet realized how confusing it was
+rights@footnote{In the 80s I had not yet realized how confusing it was
 to speak of ``the issue'' of ``intellectual property.''  That term is
 obviously biased; more subtle is the fact that it lumps together
 various disparate laws which raise very different issues.  Nowadays I
 urge people to reject the term ``intellectual property'' entirely,
 lest it lead others to suppose that those laws form one coherent
-issue.  The way to be clear is to to discuss patents, copyrights, and
+issue.  The way to be clear is to discuss patents, copyrights, and
 trademarks separately.  See
 @uref{http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/not-ipr.xhtml} for more
 explanation of how this term spreads confusion and bias.} carefully