From: Chong Yidong <cyd@stupidchicken.com>
Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 22:01:20 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: * emacs-lisp/cl-macs.el (lexical-let*): Doc fix (Bug#3178).
X-Git-Tag: emacs-pretest-23.0.94~77
X-Git-Url: https://code.delx.au/gnu-emacs/commitdiff_plain/143770f236fe75247343d0d5c063dc09d1cf10df

* emacs-lisp/cl-macs.el (lexical-let*): Doc fix (Bug#3178).
---

diff --git a/lisp/ChangeLog b/lisp/ChangeLog
index ae87752498..073d45db52 100644
--- a/lisp/ChangeLog
+++ b/lisp/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+2009-05-10  Chong Yidong  <cyd@stupidchicken.com>
+
+	* emacs-lisp/cl-macs.el (lexical-let*): Doc fix (Bug#3178).
+
 2009-05-10  Kim F. Storm  <storm@cua.dk>
 
 	* ido.el: Add proper support for confirm-nonexistent-file-or-buffer
diff --git a/lisp/emacs-lisp/cl-macs.el b/lisp/emacs-lisp/cl-macs.el
index edcb5c9056..2d6eb93550 100644
--- a/lisp/emacs-lisp/cl-macs.el
+++ b/lisp/emacs-lisp/cl-macs.el
@@ -1448,8 +1448,10 @@ lexical closures as in Common Lisp.
 ;;;###autoload
 (defmacro lexical-let* (bindings &rest body)
   "Like `let*', but lexically scoped.
-The main visible difference is that lambdas inside BODY will create
-lexical closures as in Common Lisp.
+The main visible difference is that lambdas inside BODY, and in
+successive bindings within BINDINGS, will create lexical closures
+as in Common Lisp.  This is similar to the behavior of `let*' in
+Common Lisp.
 \n(fn VARLIST BODY)"
   (if (null bindings) (cons 'progn body)
     (setq bindings (reverse bindings))