href="mailto:rodsmith@rodsbooks.com">rodsmith@rodsbooks.com</a></p>
<p>Originally written: 4/19/2012; last Web page update:
-5/9/2012, referencing rEFInd 0.3.4</p>
+1/16/2013, referencing rEFInd 0.6.5</p>
<p>I'm a technical writer and consultant specializing in Linux technologies. This Web page is provided free of charge and with no annoying outside ads; however, I did take time to prepare it, and Web hosting does cost money. If you find this Web page useful, please consider making a small donation to help keep this site up and running. Thanks!</p>
<hr />
-<p>Beginning with version 0.2.7, rEFInd has been able to load EFI drivers. Although EFI implementations should be able to do this prior to rEFInd's launch, in my experience, most EFI implementations offer such poor control over EFI driver loading that they can't be counted on to do this. Thus, if you want to use EFI drivers, rEFInd's ability to do so can be useful. This page tells you why you might want to use drivers, where you can go to find them, and provides tips on a few specific drivers.</p>
+<div style="float:right; width:55%">
+<p>Beginning with version 0.2.7, rEFInd has been able to load EFI drivers, and as of version 0.4.0, it has shipped with some EFI filesystem drivers. Although EFI implementations should be able to load drivers prior to rEFInd's launch, in my experience, most EFI implementations offer such poor control over EFI driver loading that they can't be counted on to do this. Thus, if you want to use EFI drivers, rEFInd's ability to do so can be useful. This page tells you why you might want to use drivers, how you can install and use rEFInd's own drivers, where you can go to find other drivers, and provides tips on a few specific drivers.</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<div class="navbar">
+
+<h4 class="tight">Contents</h4>
+
+<ul>
+
+<li class="tight"><a href="#why">Why Should You Use Drivers?</li>
+
+<li class="tight"><a href="#using">Using rEFInd's EFI Drivers</a></li>
+
+<li class="tight"><a href="#finding">Finding Additional Drivers</a></li>
+
+<li class="tight"><a href="#notes">Notes on Specific Drivers</a></li>
+
+</ul>
+
+</div>
+
+<br/>
+<a name="why">
<h2>Why Should You Use EFI Drivers?</h2>
+</a>
<p>EFI supports drivers, which can activate hardware or filesystems in the pre-boot environment. At the moment, EFI drivers are few and far between; but you can or might want to use them for various reasons:</p>
<ul>
+<!-- <p class="sidebar"><b>Tip:</b> Some Linux installation media come as <i>hybrid ISO</i> files, which can be written to either optical discs or USB flash drives for installation. Some of these media, though, are useless for installing to EFI systems from USB flash drives—unless your computer supports ISO-9660 on non-optical media. rEFInd's ISO-9660 driver provides this support. To use such a hybrid image from USB flash drive, you must boot using rEFInd on another disk that has the ISO-9660 driver installed. rEFInd should then provide an option to boot from the USB flash drive. I cannot guarantee that the installer will boot at this point, but it might.</p> -->
+
<li>You can load a filesystem driver to gain access to files on a filesystem other than FAT (or HFS+ on Macs or ISO-9660 on some systems). This is most likely to be useful on a Linux installation, since a filesystem driver can enable you to store a Linux kernel with EFI stub loader or for use by ELILO on a Linux-native filesystem if your ESP is getting crowded.</li>
<li>You can load a driver for a plug-in disk controller to give the EFI access to its disks. Note that this is <i>not</i> required if you place your boot loader (and perhaps your OS kernel) on another disk, or if the plug-in disk controller includes EFI-capable firmware. It could be handy, perhaps in conjunction with a filesystem driver, to enable the EFI to read a boot loader or kernel from a disk on a plug-in controller, though.</li>
<p>Note that most of these uses are theoretical, at least to me; I don't know of any specific examples of EFI drivers (available as separate files) for disk controller hardware, network cards, or video cards. Such drivers are often embedded in the firmware of the devices themselves, and should be loaded automatically by the EFI. Chances are good that a few such drivers are available, unknown to me, and more may become available in the future. If you happen to have a device and need support for it under EFI, searching for drivers is certainly worth doing.</p>
-<p>To the best of my knowledge, the best reason to want EFI driver support in rEFInd is to provide access to filesystems. Although EFI filesystem driver choices are currently limited, those that are available can help to improve your installation and configuration options, particularly if you've found yourself "boxed in" by awkward installation or bugs, such as the dinky ESP that Ubuntu creates by default or the bug that prevents a Linux kernel with <a href="efistub.html">EFI stub loader support</a> from booting from the ESP of at least some Macs.</p>
+<p>To the best of my knowledge, the best reason to want EFI driver support in rEFInd is to provide access to filesystems. Although EFI filesystem driver choices are currently limited, those that are available can help to improve your installation and configuration options, particularly if you've found yourself "boxed in" by awkward installation or bugs, such as the dinky ESP that Ubuntu creates by default or the bug that prevents a Linux kernel with <a href="http://www.rodsbooks.com/efi-bootloaders/efistub.html">EFI stub loader support</a> from booting from the ESP of at least some Macs.</p>
+
+<p>As a side note, using an ISO-9660 driver can theoretically help you keep the size of a custom Linux boot CD/DVD down to a reasonable value. This is because EFI systems normally boot from optical discs by reading a FAT image file in El Torito format and treating that file as an ESP. If you need to store the kernel both in that file and directly in the ISO-9660 filesystem (to maintain bootability on BIOS systems), that can represent an unwanted extra space requirement. Placing rEFInd and an ISO-9660 driver in the FAT image file should enable you to store the kernel on the disc only once. Unfortunately, this doesn't work in practice. When the ISO-9660 driver is loaded from the El Torito image, the driver discovers that the optical disc is in use and refuses to access it. It's possible to use EFI shell commands to give the ISO-9660 driver access to the shell device, but this causes the El Torito access to go away, which means that anything loaded from the El Torito image (such as rEFInd) is likely to malfunction. Also, some EFI implementations include ISO-9660 drivers, so you might not need a separate ISO-9660 driver if you're building a disc for a particular computer.</p>
-<p>As a side note, using an ISO-9660 driver can theoretically help you keep the size of a custom Linux boot CD/DVD down to a reasonable value. This is because EFI systems normally boot from optical discs by reading a FAT image file in El Torito format and treating that file as an ESP. If you need to store the kernel both in that file and directly in the ISO-9660 filesystem (to maintain bootability on BIOS systems), that can represent an unwanted extra space requirement. Placing rEFInd and an ISO-9660 driver in the FAT image file should enable you to store the kernel on the disc only once. Unfortunately, my attempts to get this to work have failed to date. When the ISO-9660 driver is loaded from the El Torito image, my test systems seem to allow only one of the two filesystems (the El Torito image's FAT filesystem or the optical disc's ISO-9660 filesystem) to be active; load one and the other goes away. Also, some EFI implementations include ISO-9660 drivers, so you might not need a separate ISO-9660 driver if you're building a disc for a particular computer.</p>
+<a name="using">
+<h2>Using rEFInd's EFI Drivers</h2>
+</a>
-<h2>Finding and Installing EFI Drivers</h2>
+<p class="sidebar"><b>Note:</b> If you want to use the drivers with a Mac, be sure to use at least version 0.4.3. Earlier versions were incompatible with the Mac's EFI 1.x firmware. Alternatively, you can use the drivers that came with <a href="http://refit.sourceforge.net">rEFIt,</a> which work on Macs.</p>
-<p>As already noted, I know of no EFI drivers for EFI hardware, aside from those that are built into motherboards' EFI implementations. I do, however, know of a few EFI filesystem drivers:</p>
+<p>Since version 0.4.0, rEFInd has shipped with a small collection of read-only EFI filesystem drivers. These are:</p>
<ul>
-<li><b><a href="http://refit.sourceforge.net">rEFIt's ext2fs and ReiserFS drivers</a></b>—You can gain read-only access to ext2fs, ext3fs, and ReiserFS volumes with these drivers. You can use the binaries in the <tt>refit-bin-0.14/efi/tools/drivers</tt> directory of the binary package directly on a Mac. On a UEFI-based PC, though, you'll need to break the Mac-style "fat" binary into its 32- and 64-bit components. You can use my <a href="http://www.rodsbooks.com/thin/index.html"><tt>thin</tt></a> program for this job.</li>
+<li><b>ReiserFS</b>—This driver originated with rEFIt. It's useful
+ for reading Linux kernels from a separate <tt>/boot</tt> partition, or
+ even from a root (<tt>/</tt>) filesystem, if you use ReiserFS on it.
+ <b>Caution:</b> If you use this driver, you should use the
+ <tt>notail</tt> option in Linux's <tt>/etc/fstab</tt> file for the
+ partition(s) you want the EFI to read. This is because the driver
+ doesn't properly handle ReiserFS's "tail-packing" feature, so files can
+ seem to be corrupted in EFI if you use this feature, which is disabled
+ by <tt>notail</tt>.</li>
+
+<li><b>Ext2fs</b>—This driver also originated with rEFIt. It can be
+ used in the same way as the ReiserFS driver. Although it's called an
+ "ext2fs" driver, it also works with ext3fs.</li>
+
+<li><b>Ext4fs</b>—Stefan Agner <a
+ href="https://github.com/falstaff84/rEFInd">modified the rEFIt/rEFInd
+ ext2fs driver</a> so that it could handle ext4fs. I'm including this as
+ a separate driver from the ext2fs driver, although the ext4fs version
+ can handle ext2fs and ext3fs, too. (I may eventually retire the
+ original ext2fs driver, but I want to be conservative about this in
+ case there's an undiscovered problem with the new driver.) This driver
+ has some limitations. Most notably, for various reasons it maxes out at
+ 16TiB and won't mount any ext4 filesystem that's larger than this. As
+ of version 0.6.1, this driver supports the <tt>meta_bg</tt> feature,
+ which can also be used on ext2fs and ext3fs. Thus, it can handle some
+ ext2fs and ext3fs partitions that the ext2fs driver can't handle. You
+ can learn about your ext2/3/4 filesystem features by typing <tt
+ class="userinput">dumpe2fs <i>/dev/sda2</i> | grep features</tt>,
+ changing <tt class="userinput"><i>/dev/sda2</i></tt> to your
+ filesystem's device.</li>
+
+<li><b>ISO-9660</b>—This driver originated with rEFIt's author, but
+ he never released a final version. Its code was improved by Oracle for
+ use in its VirtualBox product, and then further modified by the authors
+ of the <a
+ href="https://sourceforge.net/projects/cloverefiboot/">Clover</a> boot
+ loader. If your firmware doesn't provide its own ISO-9660 driver, this
+ one can be helpful; however, you may need to install it on your hard
+ disk before you can read an optical disc.</li>
+
+<li><b>HFS+</b>—Oracle seems to have written this driver, apparently
+ with some code taken from open source Apple examples. It was then
+ further modified by the Clover authors. I expect this driver to have
+ limited appeal to most rEFInd users. Macs don't need it, since Apple's EFI
+ implementation provides its own HFS+ driver, and HFS+ isn't normally
+ used on UEFI-based PCs. Some CDs are mastered with both ISO-9660 and
+ HFS+, or even with HFS+ alone, and it's conceivable that an HFS+ driver
+ would be useful when accessing such discs. I'm providing the driver
+ mainly because it compiled cleanly with no extra work, aside from
+ providing a Makefile entry for it.</li>
-<li><b><a href="https://sourceforge.net/projects/cloverefiboot/">Clover EFI's ISO-9660, ext2fs, and HFS+ drivers</a></b>—This project is an offshoot of TianoCore, the main UEFI project. It's primarily a Hackintosh boot loader, but it includes drivers for <a href="http://cloverefiboot.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/cloverefiboot/VBoxFsDxe/">ISO-9660, ext2fs, and HFS+;</a> however, building them requires a fair amount of expertise. You can find a compile script for the ISO-9660 driver <a href="https://github.com/the-ridikulus-rat/My_Shell_Scripts/blob/master/tianocore_uefi/iso9660_virtualbox_x86_64_udk_linux_compile.sh">here,</a> and a compiled ISO-9660 binary <a href="http://dl.dropbox.com/u/9710721/VBoxIso9600.efi">here.</a> The compiled binary has worked in a brief test; however, it didn't give access to the ISO-9660 filesystem when it was loaded from an El Torito image the ISO-9660 filesystem held.</li>
+</ul>
-<li><b><a href="http://www.osx86.net/view/2571-clover_v2_r384__efi_bootloader_pkg_+_gpt_efi_tools.html">Clover's EFI Tools package</a></b>—This osx86.net thread includes links to a package called <tt>EFI_Tools_Clover_v2_r384_EFI_x32_x64_EN.zip</tt>, which holds an OS X application (a directory with a <tt>.app</tt> extension, as seen from other platforms) with a number of drivers in the <tt>Contents/Resources/EFI/drivers64</tt> directory (and an equivalent for 32-bit binaries). Some of these, such as keyboard drivers, are unlikely to be useful unless your system is badly broken as delivered. Three that caught my eye, however, are <tt>VBoxExt2-64.efi</tt>, <tt>NTFS-64.efi</tt>, and <tt>VBoxIso9600-64.efi</tt>.</li>
+<p>All of these drivers rely on filesystem wrapper code written by rEFIt's author, Christoph Phisterer. They all suffer from speed problems on some systems, as described later in <a href="#notes">"Notes on Specific Drivers;"</a> however, these problems are very minor on most systems.</p>
-<li><b><a href="https://www.virtualbox.org/browser/vbox/trunk/src/VBox/Devices/EFI/Firmware2/VBoxPkg/VBoxFsDxe">VirtualBox's HFS+ and ISO-9660 drivers</a></b>—These drivers are available in source code form, and come with VirtualBox binaries. I've not attempted to compile them myself, but I've seen a report that suggests they may include assumptions that require use of <a href="http://www.mingw.org/">MinGW,</a> a GCC-based compiler for Windows (and cross-compiler to build Windows executables under Linux). I don't know of a source for binaries suitable for use on EFI-based computers; if you want to use them, you'll need to figure out how to compile them yourself.</li>
+<p class="sidebar"><b>Note:</b> rEFInd's <tt>install.sh</tt> script does not install drivers by default on OS X, but on Linux, it installs the driver required to read the <tt>/boot</tt> directory, if one is available. The script installs all the available drivers if you pass it the <tt>--drivers</tt> option. See the <a href="installing.html">Installing rEFInd</a> page for details.</p>
-</ul>
+<p>If you want to use one or more of these drivers, you can install them from the rEFInd binary package from the <tt>refind/drivers_<tt class="variable">arch</tt></tt> directory, where <tt class="variable">arch</tt> is a CPU architecture code—<tt>x64</tt> or <tt>ia32</tt>. The files are named after the filesystems they handle, such as <tt>ext4_x64.efi</tt> for the 64-bit ext4fs driver. You should copy the files for the filesystems you want to use to the <tt>drivers</tt> or <tt>drivers_<tt class="variable">arch</tt></tt> subdirectory of the main rEFInd installation directory. (You may need to create this subdirectory.) Be careful to install drivers only for your own architecture. Attempting to load drivers for the wrong CPU type will cause a small delay at best, or may cause the computer to crash at worst. I've placed rEFInd's drivers in directories that are named to minimize this risk, but you should exercise care when copying driver files.</p>
-<p>Most of these cross-project drivers appear to be related. For instance, the ISO-9660 drivers are both based on code written by Christoph Phisterer for rEFIt (although he doesn't seem to have finished and released it in binary form himself).</p>
+<p class="sidebar"><b>Warning:</b> <i>Do not</i> place EFI program files in your driver directories! Unfortunately, EFI uses the same <tt>.efi</tt> filename extension to identify both EFI program files and EFI drivers. Therefore, rEFInd can't distinguish between the two prior to loading them, and if you place program files in a drivers directory, rEFInd will run the EFI program file when it does its driver scan.</p>
-<p>As you can see, pickings are rather slim. Nonetheless, the drivers that exist are useful for certain purposes. The options could increase in the future, too. Source code to a wide variety of filesystems is available in GRUB Legacy, GRUB 2, Linux, various BSD kernels, and in other projects. Sooner or later somebody's likely to begin porting those drivers to EFI. If you do so, or if you know of additional EFI drivers, please <a href="mailto:rodsmith@rodsbooks.com">tell me about it,</a> so I can share the information here. Likewise if you know of a source for other EFI drivers—say, for a video card or disk controller card.</p>
+<p>When you reboot after installing drivers, rEFInd should automatically detect and use the drivers you install. There's likely to be an extra delay, typically from one to five seconds, as rEFInd loads the drivers and tells the EFI to detect the filesystems they handle. For this reason, and because of the possibility of drivers harboring bugs, I recommend installing only those drivers that you need. If you like, you can install drivers you don't plan on using to some other directory, such as <tt>/drivers</tt> on the ESP's root. You can then load these drivers manually with the EFI shell's <tt>load</tt> command if the need arises in the future. You can then tell the shell to re-assign drive identifiers with <tt>map -r</tt>:</p>
-<p class="sidebar"><b>Warning:</b> <i>Do not</i> place EFI program files in your driver directories! Unfortunately, EFI uses the same <tt>.efi</tt> filename extension to identify both EFI program files and EFI drivers. Therefore, rEFInd can't distinguish between the two prior to loading them, and if you place program files in a drivers directory, rEFInd will run the EFI program file when it does its driver scan.</p>
+<pre class="listing">
+fs0: <tt class="userinput">load reiserfs_x64.efi</tt>
+fs0: <tt class="userinput">map -r</tt>
+</pre>
-<p>Once you've obtained an EFI driver or two, you can install it in rEFInd by creating a subdirectory of the rEFInd directory called <tt>drivers</tt>—for instance, <tt>EFI/refind/drivers</tt>, if you've installed rEFInd to <tt>EFI/refind</tt> on the ESP. Alternatively, you can create a directory of any other name and use the <tt>scan_driver_dirs</tt> option in <tt>refind.conf</tt> to tell rEFInd where to look for drivers. Either way, rEFInd attempts to load all the EFI drivers from these directories, so placing your files there and rebooting will do the trick.</p>
+<a name="finding">
+<h2>Finding Additional EFI Drivers</h2>
+</a>
-<p>rEFInd is likely to take slightly longer to start up when you use drivers, but the effect is likely to be small. On my systems, it's usually just a second or so. This effect could be greater with some drivers or on some systems, though.</p>
+<p>As already noted, I know of no EFI drivers for EFI hardware, aside from those that are built into motherboards' EFI implementations. I do, however, know of a few EFI filesystem drivers, in addition to those provided with rEFInd:</p>
-<h2>Notes on Specific Drivers</h2>
+<ul>
-<p>I've tested the original rEFIt drivers on a handful of systems. First let me re-emphasize one point: To use rEFIt's ext2fs and ReiserFS drivers on a UEFI-based PC, you must separate the x86 and x86-64 binaries from the "fat" binary format that come in the binary package. You can do this with my <a href="http://www.rodsbooks.com/thin/index.html"><tt>thin</tt></a> program.</p>
+<li><b><a href="http://refit.sourceforge.net">rEFIt's ext2fs and ReiserFS drivers</a></b>—You can gain read-only access to ext2fs, ext3fs, and ReiserFS volumes with these drivers, originally written by Christoph Pfisterer. You can use the binaries in the <tt>refit-bin-0.14/efi/tools/drivers</tt> directory of the binary package directly on a Mac. On a UEFI-based PC, though, you'll need to break the Mac-style "fat" binary into its 32- and 64-bit components. You can use my <a href="http://www.rodsbooks.com/thin/index.html"><tt>thin</tt></a> program for this job.</li>
+
+<li><b><a href="https://sourceforge.net/projects/cloverefiboot/">Clover EFI's ISO-9660, ext2fs, and HFS+ drivers</a></b>—This project is an offshoot of TianoCore, the main UEFI project. It's primarily a Hackintosh boot loader, but it includes drivers for <a href="http://cloverefiboot.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/cloverefiboot/VBoxFsDxe/">ISO-9660, ext2fs, and HFS+;</a> however, building them requires a fair amount of expertise. These drivers served as a starting point for rEFInd's drivers.</li>
+
+<li><b><a href="http://www.osx86.net/view/2571-clover_v2_r384__efi_bootloader_pkg_+_gpt_efi_tools.html">Clover's EFI Tools package</a></b>—This osx86.net thread includes links to a package called <tt>EFI_Tools_Clover_v2_r447_EFI_x32_x64_EN.zip</tt>, which holds an OS X application (a directory with a <tt>.app</tt> extension, as seen from other platforms) with a number of drivers in the <tt>Contents/Resources/EFI/drivers64</tt> directory (and an equivalent for 32-bit binaries). Some of these, such as keyboard drivers, are unlikely to be useful unless your system is badly broken as delivered. Three that caught my eye, however, are <tt>VBoxExt2-64.efi</tt>, <tt>NTFS-64.efi</tt>, and <tt>VBoxIso9600-64.efi</tt>.</li>
+
+<li><b><a href="https://www.virtualbox.org/browser/vbox/trunk/src/VBox/Devices/EFI/Firmware2/VBoxPkg/VBoxFsDxe">VirtualBox's HFS+ and ISO-9660 drivers</a></b>—These drivers are available in source code form, and come with VirtualBox binaries. I've not attempted to compile them myself, but I've seen a report that suggests they may include assumptions that require use of <a href="http://www.mingw.org/">MinGW,</a> a GCC-based compiler for Windows (and cross-compiler to build Windows executables under Linux). I don't know of a source for binaries suitable for use on EFI-based computers; if you want to use them, you'll need to figure out how to compile them yourself.</li>
+
+<li><b>Ext2Pkg</b>—This driver, based on <a href="https://bitbucket.org/alinrus/ext2pkg">bitbucket</a> and with a backup on <a href="https://github.com/the-ridikulus-rat/Tianocore_Ext2Pkg">github,</a> appears to be an ext2fs/ext3fs driver built independently of the driver written by Christoph Pfisterer. The linked-to sites provide access to source code via <tt>git</tt> but do not provide binaries. When I built binaries, they failed to work. Under VirtualBox, the driver loaded but then hung when I tried to access an ext2 filesystem. On a 32-bit Mac Mini, I got error messages when I tried to access an ext2 filesystem. As I write, the code was last updated in March of 2012. If you check the project and it's been updated more recently, it might be worth trying. Otherwise, I can't recommend this driver. I mention it here only in case it improves in the future.</li>
+
+</ul>
+
+<p>Most of these cross-project drivers appear to be related, and most of them have fed into rEFInd's drivers. I used the Clover package, which in turn was based on the VirtualBox drivers, as a starting point. Everybody else has dropped rEFIt's original ReiserFS driver, but I added that back. Of these drivers, only the Clover EFI Tools NTFS driver is missing from rEFInd. Specific versions can have their own quirks, though. For instance, the Clover (and I suspect VirtualBox) drivers don't return volume labels, which causes rEFInd to display loaders on those volumes as being on a disk called <tt>Unknown</tt>. (I fixed that bug for rEFInd's version, and it wasn't present in the original rEFIt drivers.)</p>
+
+<p>Driver availability could increase in the future. Source code to a wide variety of filesystems is available in GRUB Legacy, GRUB 2, Linux, various BSD kernels, and in other projects. Sooner or later somebody's likely to begin porting those drivers to EFI. If you do so, or if you know of additional EFI drivers, please <a href="mailto:rodsmith@rodsbooks.com">tell me about it,</a> so I can share the information here. Likewise if you know of a source for other EFI drivers—say, for a video card or disk controller card.</p>
+
+<p>Once you've obtained an EFI driver, you can install it in rEFInd just as you would install rEFInd's own drivers, as described earlier.</p>
+
+<a name="notes">
+<h2>Notes on Specific Drivers</h2>
+</a>
-<p>The rEFIt ext2fs driver works on both ext2fs and ext3fs, but not on ext4fs—at least, not in my one test. (There may be options you can use when creating an ext4 filesystem that would enable the rEFIt ext2fs driver to handle it, but if so I don't know what they are.) The ReiserFS driver is obviously useful only on ReiserFS partitions. (Reiser4 is not supported, as far as I know.) Given that these filesystems are getting a bit on in age by Linux standards, you might do well to use them on a separate Linux <tt>/boot</tt> partition; however, if you're willing to use ext3fs or ReiserFS on your root (<tt>/</tt>) filesystem, you can use the rEFIt drivers to read your kernel from it. Note that this assumes you use conventional partitions; to the best of my knowledge, there's no EFI driver for Linux's Logical Volume Manager (LVM) or Redundant Array of Independent Disks (RAID) configurations, so the EFI can't access filesystems stored in these ways.</p>
+<p>I've tested several of the drivers described on this page on a handful of systems. The Pfisterer ext2fs driver (from any source) works on both ext2fs and ext3fs, but not on ext4fs—but Agner's derivative ext4fs driver handles ext4fs, so that's not a problem. The ReiserFS driver is obviously useful only on ReiserFS partitions. (Reiser4 is not supported, as far as I know.) Given that ext2fs, ext3fs, and ReiserFS are getting a bit on in age by Linux standards, you might do well to use them on a separate Linux <tt>/boot</tt> partition; however, if you're willing to use ext3fs, ext4fs, or ReiserFS on your root (<tt>/</tt>) filesystem, you can use the EFI drivers to read your kernel from it. Note that this assumes you use conventional partitions; to the best of my knowledge, there's no EFI driver for Linux's Logical Volume Manager (LVM) or Redundant Array of Independent Disks (RAID) configurations, so the EFI can't access filesystems stored in these ways.</p>
-<p>The ext2fs and ReiserFS drivers work, but they are a bit sluggish—particularly the ext2fs driver. The extent of the problem depends on the computer. In my tests so far, VirtualBox has fared the worse. On it, loading a Linux kernel with EFI stub loader from a FAT partition takes 2 seconds, from the moment of selecting the OS in rEFInd to the moment the kernel messages begin to appear. The equivalent time using ReiserFS is 20 seconds, and with ext2fs it's 200 seconds (that is, 3 minutes and 20 seconds). On a 32-bit Mac Mini, though, the speed problem is much less pronounced—my kernel loads in just 3 seconds from a ReiserFS partition and in 13 seconds from an ext2 filesystem. Times with ext2fs on a UEFI PC with an Intel motherboard were also reasonable, although I didn't record precise values. Nonetheless, if you try the ext2fs driver and it seems to hang, be patient; it may finally boot up. If so, and if the delay is too great for you to accept, you might consider using ReiserFS instead of ext2fs or ext3fs, at least if a change is practical. (For a <tt>/boot</tt> partition, it almost certainly is practical; you can back it up quite easily, create a fresh filesystem on it, and restore it. You may need to adjust your <tt>/etc/fstab</tt> entry for a new UUID value, though.)</p>
+<p>The Pfisterer ReiserFS and ext2fs drivers work, but they are a bit sluggish—particularly the ext2fs driver. The Agner ext4fs driver, when handling an actual ext4 filesystem, is in-between these two drivers in speed. The extent of the problem depends on the computer. In my tests so far, VirtualBox has fared the worst. On it, loading a Linux kernel with EFI stub loader from a FAT partition takes 2 seconds, from the moment of selecting the OS in rEFInd to the moment the kernel messages begin to appear. The equivalent time using ReiserFS or HFS+ is 20 seconds, with ext4fs it's 75 seconds, and with ext2fs it's 200 seconds (that is, 3 minutes and 20 seconds). On a 32-bit Mac Mini, though, the speed problem is much less pronounced—my kernel loads in just 3 seconds from a ReiserFS partition and in 13 seconds from an ext2 filesystem. Speeds were similar with my newest computer, an ASUS P8H77-I board. Times with ext2fs on a UEFI PC with an Intel motherboard are in the 2–4 second range. If you try the ext2fs driver and it seems to hang, be patient; it may finally boot up. If so, and if the delay is too great for you to accept, you might consider using ext4fs or ReiserFS instead of ext2fs or ext3fs, at least if a change is practical. (For a <tt>/boot</tt> partition, it almost certainly is practical; you can back it up quite easily, create a fresh filesystem on it, and restore it. You may need to adjust your <tt>/etc/fstab</tt> entry for a new UUID value, though. As noted earlier, be sure to use <tt>notail</tt> as an option in <tt>/etc/fstab</tt> for ReiserFS if you want to read it from EFI.) You can even use HFS+ on a Linux <tt>/boot</tt> partition, although this makes the most sense on a Mac, which has its own EFI HFS+ driver. Of course, you can also create a FAT <tt>/boot</tt> partition and not deal with drivers at all. Mounting your ESP at <tt>/boot</tt> is a practical solution for many users.</p>
-<p>The Clover EFI Tools ext2fs driver performs much like the rEFIt ext2fs driver, but it doesn't deliver a filesystem label, which makes it less desirable. The NTFS driver from this package is nice and speedy, though, so if for some reason you need to place a boot loader on an NTFS volume, this driver might be worth tracking down.</p>
+<p>Since the ext2fs and ReiserFS drivers share a common origin, it should come as no surprise that they perform in much the same way no matter which version (rEFIt, Clover, or rEFInd) you use. The NTFS driver from the Clover Tools package is nice and speedy, so if for some reason you need to place a boot loader on an NTFS volume, this driver might be worth tracking down.</p>
-<p>Although both ext2fs and ReiserFS are case-sensitive, these drivers treat them in a case-insensitive way. Symbolic links work, which opens up possibilities for configuration, such as using a single kernel binary for multiple Linux distributions, with a link in one subdirectory pointing to a file in another directory. (If you try this, though, be sure to use <i>relative</i> links, as in <tt>../otherdist/bzImage.efi</tt>, at least if the partition is not Linux's root filesystem.)</p>
+<p>Although ext2fs, ext3fs, ext4fs, and ReiserFS are all case-sensitive, these drivers treat them in a case-insensitive way. Symbolic links work, which opens up possibilities for configuration, such as using a single kernel binary for multiple Linux distributions, with a link in one subdirectory pointing to a file in another directory. (If you try this, though, be sure to use <i>relative</i> links, as in <tt>../otherdist/bzImage.efi</tt>, at least if the partition is not Linux's root filesystem.)</p>
</ul>
<hr />
-<p>copyright © 2012 by Roderick W. Smith</p>
+<p>copyright © 2012–2013 by Roderick W. Smith</p>
<p>This document is licensed under the terms of the <a href="FDL-1.3.txt">GNU Free Documentation License (FDL), version 1.3.</a></p>