href="mailto:rodsmith@rodsbooks.com">rodsmith@rodsbooks.com</a></p>
<p>Originally written: 4/19/2012; last Web page update:
-6/18/2013, referencing rEFInd 0.6.12</p>
+6/27/2013, referencing rEFInd 0.7.0</p>
<p>I'm a technical writer and consultant specializing in Linux technologies. This Web page is provided free of charge and with no annoying outside ads; however, I did take time to prepare it, and Web hosting does cost money. If you find this Web page useful, please consider making a small donation to help keep this site up and running. Thanks!</p>
<p>Note that most of these uses are theoretical, at least to me; I don't know of any specific examples of EFI drivers (available as separate files) for disk controller hardware, network cards, or video cards. Such drivers are often embedded in the firmware of the devices themselves, and should be loaded automatically by the EFI. Chances are good that a few such drivers are available, unknown to me, and more may become available in the future. If you happen to have a device and need support for it under EFI, searching for drivers is certainly worth doing.</p>
-<p>To the best of my knowledge, the best reason to want EFI driver support in rEFInd is to provide access to filesystems. Although EFI filesystem driver choices are currently limited, those that are available can help to improve your installation and configuration options, particularly if you've found yourself "boxed in" by awkward installation or bugs, such as the dinky ESP that Ubuntu creates by default or the bug that prevents a Linux kernel with <a href="http://www.rodsbooks.com/efi-bootloaders/efistub.html">EFI stub loader support</a> from booting from the ESP of at least some Macs.</p>
+<p>To the best of my knowledge, the best reason to want EFI driver support in rEFInd is to provide access to filesystems. Although EFI filesystem driver choices are currently
somewhat limited, those that are available can help to improve your installation and configuration options, particularly if you've found yourself "boxed in" by awkward installation or bugs, such as the dinky ESP that Ubuntu creates by default or the bug that prevents a Linux kernel with <a href="http://www.rodsbooks.com/efi-bootloaders/efistub.html">EFI stub loader support</a> from booting from the ESP of at least some Macs.</p>
<p>As a side note, using an ISO-9660 driver can theoretically help you keep the size of a custom Linux boot CD/DVD down to a reasonable value. This is because EFI systems normally boot from optical discs by reading a FAT image file in El Torito format and treating that file as an ESP. If you need to store the kernel both in that file and directly in the ISO-9660 filesystem (to maintain bootability on BIOS systems), that can represent an unwanted extra space requirement. Placing rEFInd and an ISO-9660 driver in the FAT image file should enable you to store the kernel on the disc only once. Unfortunately, this doesn't work in practice. When the ISO-9660 driver is loaded from the El Torito image, the driver discovers that the optical disc is in use and refuses to access it. It's possible to use EFI shell commands to give the ISO-9660 driver access to the shell device, but this causes the El Torito access to go away, which means that anything loaded from the El Torito image (such as rEFInd) is likely to malfunction. Also, some EFI implementations include ISO-9660 drivers, so you might not need a separate ISO-9660 driver if you're building a disc for a particular computer.</p>
changing <tt class="userinput"><i>/dev/sda2</i></tt> to your
filesystem's device.</li>
+<li><b>Btrfs</b>—</b>Samuel Liao contributed this driver, which is
+ based on the rEFIt/rEFInd driver framework and algorithms from the GRUB
+ 2.0 Btrfs driver. As of rEFInd 0.7.0, this driver is new and should be
+ considered experimental. I've tested this driver with a simple
+ one-partition filesystem and with a filesystem that spans two physical
+ devices (although I've made no attempt to ensure that the driver can
+ actually read files written to both devices). Lamuel Liao has used the
+ driver with a compressed Btrfs volume. I don't know if the driver will
+ handle other advanced Btrfs features, such as snapshots and
+ subvolumes.</li>
+
<li><b>ISO-9660</b>—This driver originated with rEFIt's author, but
he never released a final version. Its code was improved by Oracle for
use in its VirtualBox product, and then further modified by the authors
</ul>
-<p>All of these drivers rely on filesystem wrapper code written by rEFIt's author, Christoph Phisterer. They all suffer from speed problems on some systems, as described later in <a href="#notes">"Notes on Specific Drivers;"</a> however, these problems are very minor on most systems.</p>
+<p>All of these drivers rely on filesystem wrapper code written by rEFIt's author, Christoph Phisterer.</p>
<p class="sidebar"><b>Note:</b> rEFInd's <tt>install.sh</tt> script does not install drivers by default on OS X, but on Linux, it installs the driver required to read the <tt>/boot</tt> directory, if one is available. The script installs all the available drivers if you pass it the <tt>--drivers</tt> option. See the <a href="installing.html">Installing rEFInd</a> page for details.</p>
<ul>
-<li><b><a href="http://refit.sourceforge.net">rEFIt's ext2fs and ReiserFS drivers</a></b>—You can gain read-only access to ext2fs, ext3fs, and ReiserFS volumes with these drivers, originally written by Christoph Pfisterer. You can use the binaries in the <tt>refit-bin-0.14/efi/tools/drivers</tt> directory of the binary package directly on a Mac. On a UEFI-based PC, though, you'll need to break the Mac-style "fat" binary into its 32- and 64-bit components. You can use my <a href="http://www.rodsbooks.com/thin/index.html"><tt>thin</tt></a> program for this job.</li>
+<li><b><a href="http://refit.sourceforge.net">rEFIt's ext2fs and ReiserFS drivers</a></b>—You can gain read-only access to ext2fs, ext3fs, and ReiserFS volumes with these drivers, originally written by Christoph Pfisterer. You can use the binaries in the <tt>refit-bin-0.14/efi/tools/drivers</tt> directory of the binary package directly on a Mac. On a UEFI-based PC, though, you'll need to break the Mac-style "fat" binary into its 32- and 64-bit components. You can use my <a href="http://www.rodsbooks.com/thin/index.html"><tt>thin</tt></a> program for this job. As a practical matter, there's no advantage to using these drivers over rEFInd's drivers, since the latter are updated versions of the former.</li>
-<li><b><a href="https://sourceforge.net/projects/cloverefiboot/">Clover EFI's ISO-9660, ext2fs, and HFS+ drivers</a></b>—This project is an offshoot of TianoCore, the main UEFI project. It's primarily a Hackintosh boot loader, but it includes drivers for <a href="http://cloverefiboot.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/cloverefiboot/VBoxFsDxe/">ISO-9660, ext2fs, and HFS+;</a> however, building them requires a fair amount of expertise. These drivers served as a starting point for rEFInd's drivers.</li>
+<li><b><a href="https://sourceforge.net/projects/cloverefiboot/">Clover EFI's ISO-9660, ext2fs, ext4fs, and HFS+ drivers</a></b>—This project is an offshoot of TianoCore, the main UEFI project. It's primarily a Hackintosh boot loader, but it includes drivers for <a href="http://cloverefiboot.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/cloverefiboot/VBoxFsDxe/">ISO-9660, ext2fs, ext4fs, and HFS+;</a> however, building them requires a fair amount of expertise. These drivers served as a starting point for rEFInd's drivers, except for the ext4fs driver, which the Clover developers based on rEFInd's ext4fs driver. Thus, as with the rEFIt drivers, there's likely to be no advantage to using the Clover drivers over the rEFInd drivers.</li>
-<li><b><a href="http://www.osx86.net/view/2571-clover_v2_r384__efi_bootloader_pkg_+_gpt_efi_tools.html">Clover's EFI Tools package</a></b>—This osx86.net thread includes links to a package called <tt>EFI_Tools_Clover_v2_r447_EFI_x32_x64_EN.zip</tt>, which holds an OS X application (a directory with a <tt>.app</tt> extension, as seen from other platforms) with a number of drivers in the <tt>Contents/Resources/EFI/drivers64</tt> directory (and an equivalent for 32-bit binaries). Some of these, such as keyboard drivers, are unlikely to be useful unless your system is badly broken as delivered. Three that caught my eye, however, are <tt>VBoxExt2-64.efi</tt>, <tt>NTFS-64.efi</tt>, and <tt>VBoxIso9600-64.efi</tt>.</li>
+<li><b><a href="http://www.osx86.net/view/2571-clover_v2_r384__efi_bootloader_pkg_+_gpt_efi_tools.html">Clover's EFI Tools package</a></b>—This osx86.net thread includes links to a package called <tt> EFI_Tools_Clover_v2_r1888_EN.zip</tt>, which holds an OS X application (a directory with a <tt>.app</tt> extension, as seen from other platforms) with a number of drivers in the <tt>Contents/Resources/EFI/drivers64</tt> directory (and an equivalent for 32-bit binaries). Some of these, such as keyboard drivers, are unlikely to be useful unless your system is badly broken as delivered. Three that caught my eye, however, are <tt>VBoxExt2-64.efi</tt>, <tt>VBoxIso9600-64.efi</tt>, and <tt>NTFS-64.efi</tt>. The first two of those are presumably variants on rEFInd's drivers, but the NTFS driver is not. I don't know this driver's provenance, so I'm reluctant to recommend its use, but it bears mentioning.</li>
-<li><b><a href="https://www.virtualbox.org/browser/vbox/trunk/src/VBox/Devices/EFI/Firmware2/VBoxPkg/VBoxFsDxe">VirtualBox's HFS+ and ISO-9660 drivers</a></b>—These drivers are available in source code form, and come with VirtualBox binaries. I've not attempted to compile them myself, but I've seen a report that suggests they may include assumptions that require use of <a href="http://www.mingw.org/">MinGW,</a> a GCC-based compiler for Windows (and cross-compiler to build Windows executables under Linux). I don't know of a source for binaries suitable for use on EFI-based computers; if you want to use them, you'll need to figure out how to compile them yourself.</li>
+<li><b><a href="https://www.virtualbox.org/browser/vbox/trunk/src/VBox/Devices/EFI/Firmware2/VBoxPkg/VBoxFsDxe">VirtualBox's HFS+ and ISO-9660 drivers</a></b>—These drivers are available in source code form, and come with VirtualBox binaries. I've not attempted to compile them myself, but I've seen a report that suggests they may include assumptions that require use of <a href="http://www.mingw.org/">MinGW,</a> a GCC-based compiler for Windows (and cross-compiler to build Windows executables under Linux). I don't know of a source for binaries suitable for use on EFI-based computers; if you want to use them, you'll need to figure out how to compile them yourself. As noted earlier, rEFInd's drivers are closely related to these.</li>
<li><b>Ext2Pkg</b>—This driver, based on <a href="https://bitbucket.org/alinrus/ext2pkg">bitbucket</a> and with a backup on <a href="https://github.com/the-ridikulus-rat/Tianocore_Ext2Pkg">github,</a> appears to be an ext2fs/ext3fs driver built independently of the driver written by Christoph Pfisterer. The linked-to sites provide access to source code via <tt>git</tt> but do not provide binaries. When I built binaries, they failed to work. Under VirtualBox, the driver loaded but then hung when I tried to access an ext2 filesystem. On a 32-bit Mac Mini, I got error messages when I tried to access an ext2 filesystem. As I write, the code was last updated in March of 2012. If you check the project and it's been updated more recently, it might be worth trying. Otherwise, I can't recommend this driver. I mention it here only in case it improves in the future.</li>
</ul>
-<p>Most of these cross-project drivers appear to be related, and most of them have fed into rEFInd's drivers. I used the Clover package, which in turn was based on the VirtualBox drivers, as a starting point. Everybody else has dropped rEFIt's original ReiserFS driver, but I added that back. Of these drivers, only the Clover EFI Tools NTFS driver is missing from rEFInd. Specific versions can have their own quirks, though. For instance, the Clover (and I suspect VirtualBox) drivers don't return volume labels, which causes rEFInd to display loaders on those volumes as being on a disk called <tt>Unknown</tt>. (I fixed that bug for rEFInd's version, and it wasn't present in the original rEFIt drivers.)</p>
+<p>Most of these cross-project drivers appear to be related, and most of them have fed into rEFInd's drivers. I used the Clover package, which in turn was based on the VirtualBox drivers, as a starting point. Everybody else has dropped rEFIt's original ReiserFS driver, but I added that back. Of these drivers, only the Clover EFI Tools NTFS driver is missing from rEFInd. Specific versions can have their own quirks, though. For instance, the Clover (and I suspect VirtualBox) drivers don't return volume labels, which causes rEFInd to display loaders on those volumes as being on a disk called <tt>Unknown</tt>. (I fixed that bug for rEFInd's version, and it wasn't present in the original rEFIt drivers.) Most of these drivers also suffer from speed problems on some computers. This is worst with the ext2fs drivers under VirtualBox; on my main computer, that combination takes 3 minutes to load a Linux kernel and initial RAM disk file! Most real computers don't suffer nearly so badly, but some can take an extra five seconds or so to boot a kernel. I've fixed the speed problems in rEFInd's drivers as of version 0.7.0.</p>
<p>Driver availability could increase in the future. Source code to a wide variety of filesystems is available in GRUB Legacy, GRUB 2, Linux, various BSD kernels, and in other projects. Sooner or later somebody's likely to begin porting those drivers to EFI. If you do so, or if you know of additional EFI drivers, please <a href="mailto:rodsmith@rodsbooks.com">tell me about it,</a> so I can share the information here. Likewise if you know of a source for other EFI drivers—say, for a video card or disk controller card.</p>
<h2>Notes on Specific Drivers</h2>
</a>
-<p>I've tested several of the drivers described on this page on a handful of systems. The Pfisterer ext2fs driver (from any source) works on both ext2fs and ext3fs, but not on ext4fs—but Agner's derivative ext4fs driver handles ext4fs, so that's not a problem. The ReiserFS driver is obviously useful only on ReiserFS partitions. (Reiser4 is not supported, as far as I know.) Given that ext2fs, ext3fs, and ReiserFS are getting a bit on in age by Linux standards, you might do well to use them on a separate Linux <tt>/boot</tt> partition; however, if you're willing to use ext3fs, ext4fs, or ReiserFS on your root (<tt>/</tt>) filesystem, you can use the EFI drivers to read your kernel from it. Note that this assumes you use conventional partitions; to the best of my knowledge, there's no EFI driver for Linux's Logical Volume Manager (LVM) or Redundant Array of Independent Disks (RAID) configurations, so the EFI can't access filesystems stored in these ways.</p>
-
-<p>The Pfisterer ReiserFS and ext2fs drivers work, but they are a bit sluggish—particularly the ext2fs driver. The Agner ext4fs driver, when handling an actual ext4 filesystem, is in-between these two drivers in speed. The extent of the problem depends on the computer. In my tests so far, VirtualBox has fared the worst. On it, loading a Linux kernel with EFI stub loader from a FAT partition takes 2 seconds, from the moment of selecting the OS in rEFInd to the moment the kernel messages begin to appear. The equivalent time using ReiserFS or HFS+ is 20 seconds, with ext4fs it's 75 seconds, and with ext2fs it's 200 seconds (that is, 3 minutes and 20 seconds). On a 32-bit Mac Mini, though, the speed problem is much less pronounced—my kernel loads in just 3 seconds from a ReiserFS partition and in 13 seconds from an ext2 filesystem. Speeds were similar with my newest computer, an ASUS P8H77-I board. Times with ext2fs on a UEFI PC with an Intel motherboard are in the 2–4 second range. If you try the ext2fs driver and it seems to hang, be patient; it may finally boot up. If so, and if the delay is too great for you to accept, you might consider using ext4fs or ReiserFS instead of ext2fs or ext3fs, at least if a change is practical. (For a <tt>/boot</tt> partition, it almost certainly is practical; you can back it up quite easily, create a fresh filesystem on it, and restore it. You may need to adjust your <tt>/etc/fstab</tt> entry for a new UUID value, though. As noted earlier, be sure to use <tt>notail</tt> as an option in <tt>/etc/fstab</tt> for ReiserFS if you want to read it from EFI.) You can even use HFS+ on a Linux <tt>/boot</tt> partition, although this makes the most sense on a Mac, which has its own EFI HFS+ driver. Of course, you can also create a FAT <tt>/boot</tt> partition and not deal with drivers at all. Mounting your ESP at <tt>/boot</tt> is a practical solution for many users.</p>
+<p>I've tested several of the drivers described on this page on a handful of systems. The Pfisterer ext2fs driver (from any source) works on both ext2fs and ext3fs, but not on ext4fs—but Agner's derivative ext4fs driver handles ext4fs, so that's not a problem. The ReiserFS driver is obviously useful only on ReiserFS partitions. (Reiser4 is not supported, as far as I know.) The Btrfs driver is the newest of the lot, and so I've tested it the least, but it's worked for me on two test systems. Given that ext2fs, ext3fs, and ReiserFS are getting a bit on in age by Linux standards, you might do well to use them on a separate Linux <tt>/boot</tt> partition; however, if you're willing to use ext3fs, ext4fs, Btrfs, or ReiserFS on your root (<tt>/</tt>) filesystem, you can use the EFI drivers to read your kernel from it. Note that this assumes you use conventional partitions; to the best of my knowledge, there's no EFI driver for Linux's Logical Volume Manager (LVM) or Redundant Array of Independent Disks (RAID) configurations, so the EFI can't access filesystems stored in these ways.</p>
-<p>Since the ext2fs and ReiserFS drivers share a common origin, it should come as no surprise that they perform in much the same way no matter which version (rEFIt, Clover, or rEFInd) you use. The NTFS driver from the Clover Tools package is nice and speedy, so if for some reason you need to place a boot loader on an NTFS volume, this driver might be worth tracking down.</p>
+<p>As noted earlier, rEFInd's drivers prior to version 0.7.0, as well as related drivers from rEFIt, Clover, and VirtualBox, suffer from speed problems. These problems are mostly minor, adding a second or two to boot times; but on some computers, the speed problems can be dramatic, boosting kernel-load times up to as much as three minutes (under VirtualBox). If you run into excessive boot times with such a driver, try switching to the latest rEFInd driver instead.</p>
<p>Although ext2fs, ext3fs, ext4fs, and ReiserFS are all case-sensitive, these drivers treat them in a case-insensitive way. Symbolic links work; however, rEFInd 0.6.11 and later ignore symbolic links, since many distributions use them in a way that creates redundant or non-functional entries in the rEFInd menu. You should be able to use hard links if you want to use a single kernel file in multiple ways (say for two distributions).</p>