@c This is part of the Emacs manual.
-@c Copyright (C) 1985, 1986, 1987, 1993, 1995 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+@c Copyright (C) 1985, 1986, 1987, 1993, 1995, 2002, 2003, 2004,
+@c 2005, 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
@ifclear justgnu
-@node Manifesto,, MS-DOS, Top
+@node Manifesto,, Microsoft Windows, Top
@unnumbered The GNU Manifesto
@end ifclear
@ifset justgnu
-Copyright (C) 1985, 1993, 2001 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+Copyright @copyright{} 1985, 1993, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004,
+2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
-under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.1 or
+under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or
any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no
Invariant Sections, with the Front-Cover texts being ``A GNU
Manual'', and with the Back-Cover Texts as in (a) below. A copy of the
difficult.
People who have studied the issue of intellectual property
-rights@footnote{n the 80s I had not yet realized how confusing it was
+rights@footnote{In the 80s I had not yet realized how confusing it was
to speak of ``the issue'' of ``intellectual property.'' That term is
obviously biased; more subtle is the fact that it lumps together
various disparate laws which raise very different issues. Nowadays I
urge people to reject the term ``intellectual property'' entirely,
lest it lead others to suppose that those laws form one coherent
-issue. The way to be clear is to to discuss patents, copyrights, and
+issue. The way to be clear is to discuss patents, copyrights, and
trademarks separately. See
@uref{http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/not-ipr.xhtml} for more
explanation of how this term spreads confusion and bias.} carefully