byte-symbolp byte-consp byte-stringp byte-listp byte-numberp byte-integerp
byte-eq byte-equal byte-not
byte-cons byte-list1 byte-list2 ; byte-list3 byte-list4
- byte-interactive-p
- ;; How about other side-effect-free-ops? Is it safe to move an
- ;; error invocation (such as from nth) out of an unwind-protect?
- "Byte-codes that can be moved past an unbind."))
+ byte-interactive-p)
+ ;; How about other side-effect-free-ops? Is it safe to move an
+ ;; error invocation (such as from nth) out of an unwind-protect?
+ "Byte-codes that can be moved past an unbind.")
(defconst byte-compile-side-effect-and-error-free-ops
'(byte-constant byte-dup byte-symbolp byte-consp byte-stringp byte-listp